Start with evidence
Observe the current work and establish a baseline before promising a result.
AI strategy for established businesses
AI is probably already in your company: switched on inside software you pay for, picked up by staff on their own, with nobody deciding how it should be used. 013 Labs helps owners and boards of established businesses decide what AI should change, in what order, and what to leave alone; who owns each move and how it is measured. Then we build the first piece with your team, with control that stays visible.
Led by an operator, a lawyer by training, who helped scale a regional company into a major participant in a highly regulated national industry, and who builds and runs AI systems every day.
The board's agenda
The three questions a board will ask.
All eight questions the plan must answer are on the strategy page.
The moment it becomes urgent
The question rarely arrives once. It comes from the boardroom, the buyer, the lender and the market, often in the same quarter.
Someone asks what the company is doing about AI. The honest answer is a few experiments that nobody owns.
A buyer or investor asks how AI affects your margins, your staffing and your risk. The data room has no page for it.
Your lender asks how the business will hold its margins as competitors change the way they work.
A competitor starts answering customers faster. Your team is already at capacity.
Waiting to choose a direction leaves the choice to a vendor, to whoever runs IT, or to the competitor who moved first.
The definition
An AI-native company is the same company, with the same customers and people, in which AI does the routine preparation (gathering, checking, drafting, matching), named people make the decisions, and the rules between the two are written down.
What you get from it: when a board, a lender or a buyer asks what the company is doing about AI, the answer is already on paper, and the time the team gets back goes where the owner chose.
Gathering, checking, drafting and matching are designed around what current tools do well. Judgment, relationships and sign-off stay with named people.
Contracts, orders, invoices and reports become usable by management, so a question about a customer or a margin is answered from the records instead of rebuilt in a meeting.
Who decides, what needs approval, what counts as an exception, and how to stop a system are explicit for every workflow that matters.
People spend less time copying, chasing and checking, and nobody becomes the full-time minder of a new tool.
Margin, speed, cash, errors and capacity, each measured before and after the change.
Field note: what an AI-native legacy business actually looks like →
How the work fits together
Most owners start with a briefing or a strategy sprint. The sprint defines the first build; the First Build Sprint delivers it. Evidence from the diagnostic offers feeds the plan.
For owners and boards who need an AI position and a plan in the right order.
Before money is spent, see what the company record and the work itself say.
Working systems in the tools you already use, each with an owner, a measure and a way to stop it.
Prices are on the strategy and services pages. Pricing and timing are confirmed in writing; a request does not create an engagement.
Who leads the work
An AI plan for an established company needs someone who has run a business and someone who can build. At 013 Labs that is the same person.
013 Labs runs on the systems we recommend: our board packet, sales preparation and research are prepared by them and approved by a named person, so we test the advice before we give it.
That is our method, not a client result.
How we judge the work
Observe the current work and establish a baseline before promising a result.
Name what the system may do, what a person must approve, and how to stop it.
Track time, rework, delay, quality, adoption and exceptions; demonstrations and software scores do not count.
Thirty minutes is enough to tell whether you need a briefing, a sprint, or nothing yet.